A map of the United States by census tract suggests that–except in a few remote and nearly roadless parts of Alaska–few households are carfree:
In fact, a closer look reveals a different story. In 351 (out of 74,002) tracts, 75 or more percent of occupied households were carfree according to the 2015/2019 American Community Survey.1 Of these, only four were in Alaska. 312 were in New York, distributed as follows: Manhattan (New York County): 163; the Bronx: 68; Brooklyn (Kings County): 74; Queens: 6; and Staten Island (Richmond County): 1. Other U.S. cities had only a scattering of tracts where carfree levels were as high: San Francisco: 11; Boston: 3; Baltimore: 3; Philadelphia: 3; Washington: 1; Chicago: 1; Los Angeles: 1. High carfree levels in New York (and elsewhere as well) are highly correlated with density.2 Here’s a map:
Other older cities in the United States all do have substantial areas where carfree levels are extraordinarily high by American standards, but none of these areas is quite as free of automobiles as large parts of Manhattan, Brooklyn, and the Bronx. There were 1309 tracts that were more than 50% but less than 75% carfree in 2015/2019. They were widely scattered across the United States. Several of the tracts were in Indian reservations; a few were in pockets of poverty in the South or contained substantial Amish settlements; and a smaller number were in Alaska (where tracts are huge). But most were in large cities. Here’s a list, except for New York essentially by county (cities are not indicated in the data):
New York: 785 [well over half the total!]
Cook County, Ill. (Chicago): 65
Philadelphia: 55
Washington, D.C.: 44
Suffolk County, Mass. (mostly Boston): 37
Baltimore (city): 27
Wayne County, Mich. (mostly Detroit): 19
San Francisco: 18
Cuyahoga County, Ohio (mostly Cleveland): 16
Allegheny County, Pa. (mostly Pittsburgh): 16
Hudson County, N.J. (mostly Jersey City and Hoboken): 16
Essex County, N.J. (mostly Newark): 15
San Juan, P.R.: 14
New Orleans: 9
Los Angeles County, Calif. (mostly Los Angeles): 9
Hamilton County, Ohio (mostly Cincinnati): 9
King County, Wash. (mostly Seattle): 8
Onondaga County, N.Y. (mostly Syracuse): 8
Westchester County, N.Y.: 7
Alameda County, Calif. (mostly Oakland): 3
Saint Louis (city): 2
Here are maps of parts of a few large cities, again showing the distribution of carfree households, on the same nominal scale and with the same class intervals as on the map of New York above.3 Note that, just as in New York, density seems to be the major factor in determining the geography of these areas:
There were a great many more tracts—4304—in the third category identified on the maps, those in which between 25 and 50% of households had no vehicle available. In 2015/2019 such tracts made up approximately 5.8% of American census tracts. Like the tracts where more than half the households were carfree, they were disproportionately located in America’s denser large cities.4 But even many smaller and less dense cities—including most cities of the Sunbelt—had such tracts.5 Since most U.S. cities (unlike, say, New York) do not have much in the way of dense, high-prestige neighborhoods, the majority of relatively carfree tracts in smaller cities and in those of the Sunbelt are located in less well-off areas, but population density still appears to be a critical factor in determining their geography. Dense, high-prestige areas like Oakland in Pittsburgh, the Central West End in Saint Louis, South Beach in Miami Beach, and the French Quarter in New Orleans are nearly as carfree as nearby less privileged neighborhoods.6
It almost goes without saying that an obvious explanation for the inability of the United States government to do anything much to change car dependence is the country’s high level of car ownership. There are, however, several million households in large cities in which a choice has been made not to acquire an automobile. New York has many more such households than any other urban area. It’s the one large place in the United States where only a minority of households have a vehicle available.
Note added 15 October 2021. I inserted the second paragraph from the end (including footnotes 4, 5, and 6) in response to some questions posed by a couple of readers.
- This is the most recent data set available. The percentages were generated by dividing the number of carfree households—ALONE003+ALONE010—by the number of occupied households—ALONE001—and multiplying by 100. Residential units in dormitories, barracks, jails, nursing homes, and the like are not considered to be occupied households. It’s pretty safe to assume that, if these had somehow been included, the proportion of carfree households would have been higher in many places. ↩
- For New York, N.Y., alone, the correlation at the tract level between percent of households carfree and persons per square kilometer is a highly significant .659. Contrary to expectations, there is essentially no correlation between per capita income and carfree status, and adding the latter to a regression equation does not increase significance above that of a simple density/carfree equation. For the country as a whole, the correlation between percent of households carfree and persons per square kilometer is a significant .410. Because carfree households are mostly found in cities, there’s actually a significant positive correlation of .381 between per capita income and percent of households carfree, and both variables are significant in a regression equation predicting percent carfree. ↩
- Nominal scale is 1:200,000, and, if you printed or displayed the jpeg files at the same number of dots per inch, the scales of the two maps would in fact be the same, but, because of the way that browsers work (with big images, they fill available space), the maps may appear be on different scales on computer screens. I’ve included subways and light-rail/streetcar lines and parks on all the maps. In a few cases the underlying files have not been cleaned up and so show railroad yards and the like. An additional problem is that parkland (shown in light green) is not defined in the same way for all these cities. ↩
- Some figures: New York, N.Y.: 562; Cook County, Ill. (Chicago): 318; Philadelphia: 142; Washington, D.C.: 88; Baltimore (city): 87; Suffolk County, Mass. (Boston): 81; San Francisco: 61. ↩
- Some examples, by county: Wayne County, Mich. (Detroit): 120; Los Angeles County, Calif.: 114; Hudson County, N.J. (Jersey City and Hoboken, New York area): 92; Essex County, N.J. (Newark, New York area): 87; Cuyahoga County, Ohio (Cleveland): 68; Allegheny County, Pa. (Pittsburgh): 63; Milwaukee County, Wis.: 61; Miami-Dade County, Fla.: 52; Erie County, N.Y. (Buffalo): 50; Orleans Parish, La. (New Orleans): 45; San Juan Municipio, P.R.: 44; Saint Louis (city): 44; Fulton County, Ga. (Atlanta): 35; Middlesex County, Mass. (Boston area): 33; Clark County, Nev. (Las Vegas): 33; Hartford County, Conn.: 30; New Haven County, Conn.: 30; Honolulu County, Hawaii: 28; Alameda County, Calif. (Oakland): 26; Passaic County, N.J. (New York area): 25; Hennepin County, Minn. (Minneapolis): 25; Maricopa County, Ariz. (Phoenix): 24; Westchester County, N.Y. (New York area): 23; King County, Wash. (Seattle): 21; Dallas County Tex.: 19; Harris County, Tex. (Houston): 14. ↩
- Here are some maps. Class intervals, colors, and nominal scales are the same as on the map of New York above.
This is very interesting! I hope more people continue to choose to live without cars.
I’m looking for a more detailed map of Southern and Midwest cities. Can you tell me what this map is called and can you please provide a link to it.
Thanks
Daniel,
See the second paragraph from the end and (especially) footnote 6. You weren’t the only person to ask about other cities. Thanks for giving me an incentive to act.
Chris Winters